Evaluation of the Efficacy and Results of Intraoperative Nerve Conduction in Nerve Reconstruction of the Hand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Nerve reconstruction in the hand is a critical aspect of hand surgery, aiming to restore sensory and motor function and improve overall hand functionality. Intraoperative nerve conduction, a neurophysiological technique, plays a pivotal role in nerve reconstruction surgeries. This literature review evaluates the efficacy and results of intraoperative nerve conduction in hand nerve reconstruction.
Theoretical Framework: Intraoperative nerve conduction involves electrical stimulation of nerve fibers and the recording of nerve conduction responses in real-time during surgery. The technique aids in nerve identification, assessment, and surgical decision-making.
Discussion: Intraoperative nerve conduction has shown efficacy in guiding surgical interventions and predicting postoperative outcomes. It has been particularly useful in complex nerve injuries, providing valuable feedback for optimal surgical planning.
Challenges: Despite its benefits, intraoperative nerve conduction has limitations, such as timing issues and the need for skilled neurophysiologists and specialized equipment.
Future Implications: Standardizing protocols and conducting larger prospective studies can enhance its reliability and identify specific scenarios where intraoperative nerve conduction provides the greatest benefit.
Conclusion: Intraoperative nerve conduction is a valuable tool in hand nerve reconstruction, contributing to improved patient outcomes and the advancement of hand surgery. Continued research and technological advancements hold promise for its further optimization and wider applicability in the field.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Yan, J. G., Eldridge, M. P., Dzwierzynski, W. W., Sanger, J. R., Matloub, H. S., Yan, Y. H., ... & Jaradeh, S. (2008). Intraoperative electrophysiological studies to predict the efficacy of neurolysis after nerve injury—Experiment in rats. Hand, 3(3), 257-262.
II. Lall, R. R., Lall, R. R., Hauptman, J. S., Munoz, C., Cybulski, G. R., Koski, T., ... & Smith, Z. A. (2012). Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist. Neurosurgical focus, 33(5), E10.
III. Luo, T. D., Trammell, A. P., Hedrick, L. P., Wiesler, E. R., Walker, F. O., & Warburton, M. J. (2020). Ulnar Nerve Enlargement at the Medial Epicondyle Negatively Correlates With Nerve Conduction Velocity in Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. HAND, 15(2), 165-169.
IV. Griffin, J. W., Hogan, M. V., Chhabra, A. B., & Deal, D. N. (2013). Peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction. Jbjs, 95(23), 2144-2151.
V. Krzesniak, N. E., Sarnowska, A., Figiel-Dabrowska, A., Osiak, K., Domanska-Janik, K., & Noszczyk, B. H. (2021). Secondary release of the peripheral nerve with autologous fat derivates benefits for functional and sensory recovery. Neural Regeneration Research, 16(5), 856.
VI. Dahlin, L. B., & Wiberg, M. (2017). Nerve injuries of the upper extremity and hand. EFORT open reviews, 2(5), 158-170.