The Study on the Typology of Kenyang Diet and Low-Energy Diet on Obesity Therapy

Main Article Content

Alfina Nur Isyrofi
Endang Widajati
Rany Adelina
Annasari Mustafa

Abstract

This study examines the characteristics and composition of macro and micronutrients in kenyang diet in obesity therapy compared with a regular obesity diet, a low-energy diet. The approach is qualitative, Diet Quality Index (DQI-I) instruments is used for kenyang diet and low-energy diet consumers. Kenyang diet and the low energy diet have different characteristics from qualitative and quantitative aspects. Kenyang diet has the principle of natural food ingredients without processing and elimination of food additives. In comparison, the low-energy diet focuses on consuming foods low in energy, high in protein, sufficient in fat, and high in fiber. The composition of the kenyang diet obtained was 22% protein, 45% fat, and 35% carbohydrates from the total energy intake. Compared to kenyang diet, low-energy diet meets a balanced nutritional composition. Processing the menu in kenyang diet and low-energy diet has differences in frying technique. Kenyang diet as a qualitative diet has advantages and disadvantages in terms of nutrition and health. Consumption of natural foods and avoiding processed foods is a good health approach. Kenyang diet uses mindful techniques as the initial stage of the diet by giving full attention to what is eaten. However, kenyang diet has a risk of iodine and potassium deficiency due to the absence of consumption of table salt and milk in the long term.

Article Details

How to Cite
Isyrofi, A. N. ., Widajati, E. ., Adelina, R. ., & Mustafa, A. . (2022). The Study on the Typology of Kenyang Diet and Low-Energy Diet on Obesity Therapy. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 2(08), 885–889. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v2-i8-33
Section
Articles

References

I. Adelina, R. (2018). BMI correlated to dietary pattern of Indonesian college students lives in Taipei city, Taiwan. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 12(3), 1308–1311.

II. Baik, B. K., & Ullrich, S. E. (2008). Barley for food: Characteristics, improvement, and renewed interest. Journal of Cereal Science, 48(2), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2008.02.002

III. Byrne, E., Kearney, J., & MacEvilly, C. (2017). The Role of Influencer Marketing and Social Influencers in Public Health. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76(OCE3), 2017.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665117001768

IV. Fitriah, A. H., & K D, A. B. F. (2017). Diet Mayo. Wahyu Media.

V. Hughes, D. (2017). #DietKenyang dengan Cooking Hipnoterapi. Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

VI. Machado, P. P., Steele, E. M., Levy, R. B., da Costa Louzada, M. L., Rangan, A., Woods, J., Gill, T., Scrinis, G., & Monteiro, C. A. (2020). Ultra-processed food consumption and obesity in the Australian adult population. Nutrition and Diabetes, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41387-020-00141-0

VII. Mårtensson, A., Stomby, A., Tellström, A., Ryberg, M., Waling, M., & Otten, J. (2021). Using a paleo ratio to assess adherence to paleolithic dietary recommendations in a randomized controlled trial of individuals with type 2 diabetes. Nutrients, 13(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13030969

VIII. Teruel, M. del R., Gordon, M., Linares, M. B., Garrido, M. D., Ahromrit, A., & Niranjan, K. (2015). A Comparative Study of the Characteristics of French Fries Produced by Deep Fat Frying and Air Frying. Journal of Food Science, 80(2), E349–E358. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12753

IX. Yong, W., Amin, L., & Dongpo, C. (2019). Status and prospects of nutritional cooking. Food Quality and Safety, 3(3), 137–143.

https://doi.org/10.1093/fqsafe/fyz01977.

X. WHO. (2021). Obesity and

overweight.https://www.who.int/network