Difference in Days of Mechanical Ventilation in Prone Position Less than 48 Hours Compared to More than 48 Hours in Critical Patients with Sdra and Covid-19
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The COVID 19 pandemic has come to change paradigms in terms of ventilatory support measures worldwide, prone ventilation was shown to decrease mortality in patients with ARDS.
Objective:To identify the difference in days of mechanical ventilation of patients with respiratory failure by COVID-19 In the Intensive Care Unit with prone position for £48 hours compared to >48 hours.
Material and methods: We evaluated all patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit of UMAE Hospital No. 1 de Especialidades del Bajío, who required mechanical ventilation and prone position for refractory acute respiratory failure due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we identified those in prone position for £48 hours versus > 48 hours (h), and we evaluated the difference in days of mechanical ventilation between the two groups, concluding who maintained more days of mechanical ventilation.
Results: Statistical significance was found only for the following variables: days of mechanical ventilation (p=<0.001), days of ICU stay (p=0.04), time in prone position (p=0.001) and PaO2/FiO2 ratio after maintaining prone position (p=<0.001).
Conclusion: The improvement in the oxygenation index in prone position >48 h is greater compared to those who remained £48 h, however, the time (days) under mechanical ventilation was less in the £48 h group; complications had no impact on the time in prone position.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
I. Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(9):1015-1024.
II. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with World Healt Organization. Global Surveillance for human infection with coronavirus disease 2020. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
III. Öner Özdemir. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Diagnosis and Management (Narrative Review). Erciyes Med J 2020; 42(3): 00–00.
IV. Prokop M, van Everdingen W, van Rees Vellinga T, et al. CO-RADS: A Categorical CT Assessment Scheme for Patients Suspected of Having COVID-19-Definition and Evaluation. Radiology. 2020;296(2):E97-E104.
V. Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):69.
VI. Ayzac L, Girard R, Baboi L, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial. Intensive Care Med.
;42(5):871-878.
VII. Ge H, Wang X, Yuan X, et al. The epidemiology and clinical information about COVID-19. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39(6):1011-1019
VIII. Ren LL, Wang YM, Wu ZQ, et al. Identification of a novel coronavirus causing severe pneumonia in human: a descriptive study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133(9):1015-1024.
IX. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(8):727-733.
X. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708-1720.
XI. ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526-2533.
XII. Papazian L, Aubron C, Brochard L, et al. Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9(1):69.
XIII. Gattinoni L, Carlesso E, Taccone P, Polli F, Guérin C, Mancebo J. Prone positioning improves survival in severe ARDS: a pathophysiologic review and individual patient meta-analysis. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010;76(6):448-454.
XIV. Shang Y, Pan C, Yang X, et al. Management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in ICU: statement from front-line intensive care experts in Wuhan, China. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):73. Published 2020 Jun 6.
XV. Albert RK, Hubmayr RD. The prone position eliminates compression of the lungs by the heart. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(5):1660-1665.
XVI. Santini A, Protti A, Langer T, et al. Prone position ameliorates lung elastance and increases functional residual capacity independently from lung recruitment. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2015;3(1):55.
XVII. Sun Q, Qiu H, Huang M, Yang Y. Lower mortality of COVID-19 by early recognition and intervention: experience from Jiangsu Province. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):33.
XVIII. Ayzac L, Girard R, Baboi L, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(5):871-878.
XIX. Guerin C, Gaillard S, Lemasson S, et al. Efectos del posicionamiento en decúbito prono sistemático en la insuficiencia respiratoria aguda hipoxémica: un ensayo controlado aleatorio. JAMA. 2004; 292 (19): 2379–2387.
XX. Jochmans S, Mazerand S, Chelly J, et al. Duration of prone position sessions: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2020;10(1):66.
XXI. P. Concha, M. Treso-Geira, C. Esteve-Sala et al., Ventilación mecánica invasiva y decúbito prono prolongado durante la pandemia por COVID-19, Medicina Intensiva, 2021.01.001
XXII. Mancebo J, Fernández R, Blanch L, et al. A multicenter trial of prolonged prone ventilation in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173(11):1233-1239. doi:10.1164/rccm.200503-353OC
XXIII. Shelhamer MC, Wesson PD, Solari IL, et al. Prone Positioning in Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19: A Cohort Study and Analysis of Physiology. J Intensive Care Med. 2021;36(2):241-252
XXIV. Binda F, Galazzi A, Marelli F, et al. Complications of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2021;67:103088.