Excision and Unilateral Inguinal Skin Graft Reconstruction on a Four-Year Old Penile Granuloma

Main Article Content

Clara Menna
Vita Alfia Shafadilla
Areska Ramadhan
Maria Valentine

Abstract

Background: Foreign substance injections into the penile subcutaneous tissue to enlarge the penis frequently produce disastrous complications, such as penile granulomas. Here we reported a case of penile granuloma along with our reconstruction technique.


Method: This report presents a 57-year-old male with a 4-year-old granuloma with recurrent ulcers. A penile reconstruction was conducted using unilateral inguinal full-thickness skin graft. Patient was discharged after one week and followed with regular visits to the outpatient clinic for 6 months.


Results: No complication was reported post-surgery and wounds recovered well. However, the patient complained on reduced sensation and pain on the penile tip, and inability to erect after 6 weeks post-surgery. After 6 months post-surgery, the patient can retain erection with remaining sexual dissatisfaction.


Conclusion: Inguinal full-thickness skin grafts provide adequate coverage for penile reconstruction in granuloma excision. Eventually, regaining sexual function and satisfaction remain an intricate challenge to face.

Article Details

How to Cite
Menna, C., Shafadilla, V. A., Ramadhan, A., & Valentine, M. (2022). Excision and Unilateral Inguinal Skin Graft Reconstruction on a Four-Year Old Penile Granuloma . International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 2(08), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v2-i8-03
Section
Articles

References

I. Bayraktar N, Başar İ. Penile Paraffinoma. Urol Case Rep. 2012;2012:1-2. DOI:10.1155/2012/202840

II. Dachlan I. Penile granuloma caused by liquid silicone injection. Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran. 2015;39(1):53–8.

III. Matton G, Anseeuw A, De Keyser F. The history of injectable biomaterials and the biology of collagen. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 1985;9(2):133–40. DOI:10.1007/BF01570345.

IV. Coleman SR. Injectable silicone returns to the United States. Aesthet Surg J. 2001;21(6):576–8. DOI:10.1067/maj.2001.120705

V. Salauddin SA, Ghazali H. Surgical Techniques for Correction of Penile Paraffinoma. Malays J Med Sci. 2019;26(6):137–42.

DOI: 10.21315/mjms2019.26.6.14

VI. Manap AHA, Rashid AA, Devaraj NK, Fathi NQFNH. A presentation of penile siliconoma in primary care after a dubious implant injection: A case report. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2019;15(3):170–2.

VII. Hamzah AA, Shakir Bathusha M, Nor M, Rahman G, Khan AH. Penile Siliconoma: Complication of Unregulated Penile Augmentation with Foreign Material. Int J Surg. 2015;2015(1):13.

DOI:10.5923/j.surgery.20150401.01

VIII. Inn FX, Imran F-H, Ali MF, Ih R, Z Z. Penile augmentation with resultant foreign material granuloma and sequalae. Malays J Med Sci. 2012;19(4):81–3. PMID:23613653

IX. Wiwanitkit V. Penile injection of foreign bodies in eight Thai patients. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80(6):546–546. DOI:10.1136/sti.2004.011064

X. Lee T, Choi HR, Lee YT, Lee YH. Paraffinoma of the Penis. Yonsei Med J. 1994;35(3):344–8. DOI:10.3349/ymj.1994.35.3.344

XI. Jeong JH, Shin HJ, Woo SH, Seul JH. A New Repair Technique for Penile Paraffinoma. Ann Plast Surg. 1996;37(4):386–93

DOI:10.1097/00000637-199610000-00007

XII. Kim SW, Yoon B il, Ha US, Kim SW, Cho YH, Sohn DW. Treatment of paraffin-induced lipogranuloma of the penis by bipedicled scrotal flap with Y-V incision. Ann Plast Surg. 2014;73(6):6925.

DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31828637d3

XIII. Fakin R, Zimmermann S, Jindarak S, Lindenblatt N, Giovanoli P, Suwajo P. Reconstruction of Penile Shaft Defects Following Silicone Injection by Bipedicled Anterior Scrotal Flap. J Urol. 2017;197(4):1166–70. DOI:10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.093

XIV. Shin YS, Zhao C, Park JK. New reconstructive surgery for penile paraffinoma to prevent necrosis of ventral penile skin. Urol J. 2013;81(2):437–41. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.017

XV. Hwang K. Burn of silicon-injected penis treated with dartos musculocutaneous flap. J Burn Care Res J. 2011;32(2).

DOI:10.1097/BCR.0b013e31820ab130

XVI. Shaeer O, Shaeer K. Delayed complications of gel injection for penile girth augmentation. J Sex Med. 2009;6(7):2072–8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01262.x

XVII. Bronselaer GA, Schober JM, Meyer-Bahlburg HFL, T’Sjoen G, Vlietinck R, Hoebeke PB. Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort. BJU Int. 2013; 111(5):820–7. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11761.x