Review of Current and Future Methods for Fracture Repair

Main Article Content

Laura Yuritzi Barroso Barrera
Diana Laura Zempoaltecatl Meza
Hanna Samantha Varela Leyva
Octavio Alfredo Roberto De León Martínez
Diego Alejandro Castillo Contreras
Juan Carlos Cristino Lira
Miguel Angel Hernández Serrato
Laura Patricia Puebla Acosta

Abstract

One special kind of tissue found in bones is that it may regrow after injury. Nonetheless, for correct alignment and healing, there are some fractures and abnormalities that call for professional intervention. As with any implant, the material chosen to make the implants to treat these issues needs to be carefully considered. The implants themselves may cause bone fractures or abnormalities, or there may be no bone healing at all, if the wrong material is selected. Metals, ceramics, and polymers are the three types of biomaterials that have been employed in the treatment of bone abnormalities as well as fractures. Each class of biomaterial has certain advantages and restrictions related to its uses. In an effort to capitalize on the many advantages that each of these materials has to offer, composites of these various materials have also been developed. This study outlines the many materials that have been developed to treat fractures and bone deformities in place of bone grafts, as well as their drawbacks and the need for more research

Article Details

How to Cite
Laura Yuritzi Barroso Barrera, Diana Laura Zempoaltecatl Meza, Hanna Samantha Varela Leyva, Octavio Alfredo Roberto De León Martínez, Diego Alejandro Castillo Contreras, Juan Carlos Cristino Lira, Miguel Angel Hernández Serrato, & Laura Patricia Puebla Acosta. (2024). Review of Current and Future Methods for Fracture Repair. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research Studies, 4(02), 199–202. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmscrs/v4-i02-07
Section
Articles

References

I. Raman, R., Grant, L., Seo, Y., Cvetkovic, C., Gapinske, M., Palasz, A., ... & Bashir, R. (2017). Damage, healing, and remodeling in optogenetic skeletal muscle bioactuators. Advanced healthcare materials, 6(12), 1700030.

II. Browner, B. D. (Ed.). (2009). Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction (Vol. 1). Elsevier Health Sciences.

III. Einhorn, T. A., & Lee, C. A. (2001). Bone regeneration: new findings and potential clinical applications. JAAOS-Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 9(3), 157-165.

IV. Alghazali, K. M., Nima, Z. A., Hamzah, R. N., Dhar, M. S., Anderson, D. E., & Biris, A. S. (2015). Bone-tissue engineering: complex tunable structural and biological responses to injury, drug delivery, and cell-based therapies. Drug metabolism reviews, 47(4), 431-454.

V. Schatzker, J. (1995). Changes in the AO/ASIF principles and methods. Injury, 26, B51-B56.

VI. Chrcanovic, B. R. (2013). Open versus closed reduction: comminuted mandibular fractures. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 17, 95-104.

VII. Fragomen, A. T., & Rozbruch, S. R. (2007). The mechanics of external fixation. HSS Journal®, 3(1), 13-29.

VIII. Ziran, B. H., Smith, W. R., Anglen, J. O., & Tornetta III, P. (2007). External fixation: how to make it work. JBJS, 89(7), 1620-1632.

IX. Müller, M. E., Bandi, W., Bloch, H. R., Allgöwer, M., Willenegger, H., Mumenthaler, A., ... & Weber, B. G. (2012). Technique of internal fixation of fractures. Springer Science & Business Media.

X. Schatzker, J., Tile, M., & Schatzker, J. (2005). Principles of internal fixation. The rationale of operative fracture care, 3-31.

XI. Ong, K. L., Lovald, S., & Black, J. (2014). Orthopaedic biomaterials in research and practice. CRC press.

XII. Armiento, A. R., Hatt, L. P., Sanchez Rosenberg, G., Thompson, K., & Stoddart, M. J. (2020). Functional biomaterials for bone regeneration: a lesson in complex biology. Advanced Functional Materials, 30(44), 1909874.

XIII. Kim, T., See, C. W., Li, X., & Zhu, D. (2020). Orthopedic implants and devices for bone fractures and defects: Past, present and perspective. Engineered Regeneration, 1, 6-18.

XIV. Hofmann, G. O. (1995). Biodegradable implants in traumatology: a review on the state-of-the-art. Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 114, 123-132.

XV. Gao, X., Fraulob, M., & Haïat, G. (2019). Biomechanical behaviours of the bone–implant interface: a review. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 16(156), 20190259.

XVI. Di Silvio, L. (2007). Bone tissue engineering and biomineralization. In Tissue engineering using ceramics and polymers (pp. 319-331). Woodhead Publishing.

XVII. Wei, S., Ma, J. X., Xu, L., Gu, X. S., & Ma, X. L. (2020). Biodegradable materials for bone defect repair. Military medical research, 7(1), 1-25.

XVIII. Memon, A. R., Wang, E., Hu, J., Egger, J., & Chen, X. (2020). A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants. Expert review of medical devices, 17(4), 345-356.

XIX. Chen, X., Xu, L., Wang, W., Li, X., Sun, Y., & Politis, C. (2016). Computer-aided design and manufacturing of surgical templates and their clinical applications: a review. Expert review of medical devices, 13(9), 853-864.

XX. Pesode, P., & Barve, S. (2022). Additive manufacturing of metallic biomaterials and its biocompatibility. Materials Today: Proceedings.

XXI. Osypko, K. F., Ciszyński, M. P., Kubasiewicz-Ross, P., & Hadzik, J. (2023). Bone tissue 3D bioprinting in regenerative dentistry through the perspective of the diamond concept of healing: A narrative review. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med, 32, 921-931.

Most read articles by the same author(s)